C++ Logo

STD-DISCUSSION

Advanced search

Subject: Re: UDL operators and space?
From: Peter C++ (peter.cpp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-06-17 14:28:48


sent from a mobile device so please excuse strange words due to autocorrection.
Prof. Peter Sommerlad
peter.Sommerlad_at_[hidden]
+41-79-432 23 32

> On 17 Jun 2019, at 21:25, Matthew Woehlke via Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> which, BTW, is clear as mud :-). I *think* this means that "C++11"
> compilers are supposed to retroactively implement the defect resolution?
> Or does it mean "yeah, we could have done that better; oh well, it's
> fixed in the next standard"?

Some defects are fixed retrospectively, for example

auto i{42};// int

And newer compilers implement it for older standards eg c++11


STD-DISCUSSION list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com

Older Archives on Google Groups