Subject: Re: [isocpp-ext] P2320: "The Syntax of Static Reflection" feedback request
From: Axel Naumann (Axel.Naumann_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-02-16 05:53:35
On 16.02.21 02:00, Corentin via Ext wrote:
> would love to see evidence of such tool existing to such extent that
> claiming $ in C++ would be problematic.
> Just one!
My memory is not as capable as Ville's, so I'm certainly also at the
risk of rehashing things. But I remember the following discussion
elements. In the discussion that I attended the result was, "oh well,
could be done". That might not be the authoritative conclusion that
CMake wants to do fancy things with $ in code. But the committee's CMake
friends stated that this should not matter to the committee.
Tooling not based on proper C++ parsing was already majorly broken by
These smart arguments are not mine, I am merely quoting smart people.
SG7 list run by email@example.com
Older Archives on Google Groups