Tuesday, 11:00am to 12 noon ET, or 11:30am to 12:30pm ET is fine with me.

- Victor

On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:21 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I'm not sure we were talking consistent time zones for some of this. It
> sounds like Tuesdays 11:00-12:00 ET would work for everybody, except it's
> slightly marginal for me? I'd prefer to start at 11:30 ET (8:30 PT, 17:30
> CET) until it looks like we actually need the hour. Does that work for
> everybody? Jens might for the first time actually have work conflicts.
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:58 PM Victor Luchangco <
> victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> I can usually make any meeting that ends by 1pm ET (so 10am PT), except
>> on Fridays, where the morning won't usually work,
>> but I could do something at 12-1pm ET (9-10am PT). The Tuesday time, for
>> example, works well for me. Generally, earlier is better for me.
>>
>> - Victor
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:32 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll go ahead and cancel tomorrow's meeting.
>>>
>>> Yes, it would be great if we can find a time slot that's likely to work
>>> for everybody and in the fall.
>>>
>>> I think we should try to end no later than noon Pacific Time, and
>>> ideally earlier, to allow European attendance. I can usually make Monday
>>> after 10:00, Tuesday 8:30-10:00, Wednesday after 9:30, and Friday
>>> 8:30-10:00. If you are a regular attendee or would like to be, please let
>>> me know which of those slots you can make. AFAICT, this already avoids the
>>> new SG1 slot on Mondays.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 6:57 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’m ok with canceling. We should also find a different time of the
>>>> week for the next one, to get Victor back on the call.
>>>>
>>>> - Michael
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It turns out I have a conflict between our June 24th meeting and a
>>>> floating point workshop.
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK, there have not been any SG1 meetings, so our status is
>>>> essentially unchanged. If someone has a reason to meet, we could reschedule
>>>> to a different week, or try to carry on without me. Otherwise I suggest
>>>> just skipping this one.
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:51 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't have anything for tomorrow's meeting except a really brief
>>>>> status update. But we concluded last time that we should just go ahead and
>>>>> meet, and abbreviate the meeting if there's nothing to discuss. On that
>>>>> basis, let's meet as scheduled. The meeting will probably be brief.
>>>>>
>>>>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd, 10:15a.m. PDT
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's go ahead and try to meet briefly. The only agenda item I have
>>>>>> is a quick update on WG21 process under Covid-19, to the extent I
>>>>>> understand it. If Jens or Michael Wong is there, they can probably do a
>>>>>> better job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there's anything else to discuss, let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Coordinates, more or less as usual:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd or +1 208-925-0196‬ PIN: ‪255 542‬#
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 10:15a.m. PDT
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>