I'm not sure we were talking consistent time zones for some of this. It
sounds like Tuesdays 11:00-12:00 ET would work for everybody, except it's
slightly marginal for me? I'd prefer to start at 11:30 ET (8:30 PT, 17:30
CET) until it looks like we actually need the hour. Does that work for
everybody? Jens might for the first time actually have work conflicts.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:58 PM Victor Luchangco <
victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I can usually make any meeting that ends by 1pm ET (so 10am PT), except on
> Fridays, where the morning won't usually work,
> but I could do something at 12-1pm ET (9-10am PT). The Tuesday time, for
> example, works well for me. Generally, earlier is better for me.
>
> - Victor
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:32 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> I'll go ahead and cancel tomorrow's meeting.
>>
>> Yes, it would be great if we can find a time slot that's likely to work
>> for everybody and in the fall.
>>
>> I think we should try to end no later than noon Pacific Time, and ideally
>> earlier, to allow European attendance. I can usually make Monday after
>> 10:00, Tuesday 8:30-10:00, Wednesday after 9:30, and Friday 8:30-10:00. If
>> you are a regular attendee or would like to be, please let me know which of
>> those slots you can make. AFAICT, this already avoids the new SG1 slot on
>> Mondays.
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 6:57 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m ok with canceling. We should also find a different time of the week
>>> for the next one, to get Victor back on the call.
>>>
>>> - Michael
>>>
>>> On Jun 21, 2020, at 9:54 PM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It turns out I have a conflict between our June 24th meeting and a
>>> floating point workshop.
>>>
>>> AFAIK, there have not been any SG1 meetings, so our status is
>>> essentially unchanged. If someone has a reason to meet, we could reschedule
>>> to a different week, or try to carry on without me. Otherwise I suggest
>>> just skipping this one.
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 5:51 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't have anything for tomorrow's meeting except a really brief
>>>> status update. But we concluded last time that we should just go ahead and
>>>> meet, and abbreviate the meeting if there's nothing to discuss. On that
>>>> basis, let's meet as scheduled. The meeting will probably be brief.
>>>>
>>>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd, 10:15a.m. PDT
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Let's go ahead and try to meet briefly. The only agenda item I have is
>>>>> a quick update on WG21 process under Covid-19, to the extent I understand
>>>>> it. If Jens or Michael Wong is there, they can probably do a better job.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there's anything else to discuss, let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Coordinates, more or less as usual:
>>>>>
>>>>> meet.google.com/sbj-cvgh-vnd or +1 208-925-0196‬ PIN: ‪255 542‬#
>>>>>
>>>>> 10:15a.m. PDT
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>