That's great news indeed! Thanks for the update.

- Victor

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:44 PM Michael L. Scott <scott_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Excellent news!
>
> On Feb 18, 2020, at 4:39 PM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> FYI:
>
> P2066 was reviewed by SG1 twice, resulting in several tweaks to the
> constructs that are disallowed or implementation-defined in transactions.
> AFAICT, SG1 is quite happy with the current state of things. The
> paper didn't quite get voted out of SG1 for EWG review (mostly because we
> kept finding corner cases that needed to be addressed), but it was close,
> and I expect that to happen next time.
>
> Jens may want to add more.
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:51 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Let's split the difference, and do 1:15 EST = 10:15 PST = 7:15 CET
>> tomorrow, Wednesday. That'll force two people to each miss 15 minutes.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Victor Luchangco <
>> victor.luchangco.work_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> This week, any time from 11:30am to 5pm ET works for me.
>>>
>>> For a regular meeting, I can usually make most afternoons (ET), but
>>> Tuesday is generally not as good.
>>>
>>> - Victor
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 7:53 AM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm available 1:30-5 Eastern this week, but not 1-1:30.
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 4, 2020, at 1:07 AM, Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>> I could do W 1:00-2:00 EST as well.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:31 PM Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> Wednesdays I am not available from 2:00-3:30, so I'd only be able to
>>>>> attend the first half.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:29 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Do Wednesdays 10:30 PST = 1:30 EST work for others, too? It would be
>>>>>> nice to get one more meeting in before the WG21 meeting in Prague next week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing works for me this Thurs. Every second Thurs (inc. next
>>>>>>> Thurs) I'm available 9-1:45 Eastern. Fridays are completely out. Mondays
>>>>>>> after good except 11:45-12:15. Tuesdays are good 9-11:15 or 12:15-1:45.
>>>>>>> Wednesdays are good 9-2:45.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Michael Spear <mfs409_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My only hard constraint this semester is 2:00-3:30 M/W. Other than
>>>>>>> that, I can make just about anything work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:05 PM Hans Boehm <boehm_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You should probably drop the meeting@ email address if you want to
>>>>>>>> reply publicly. And I should probably not have cross-posted for this reason.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What's a better alternative? 10:30 generally works fairly well for
>>>>>>>> me. Earlier is mostly bad for me because my Google meetings tend to want a
>>>>>>>> Europe-friendly time. Much later than 10:30 makes it so Europe-unfriendly
>>>>>>>> that we may cut into our participation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 5:39 PM Michael L. Scott <mlscott_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This was rejected by the listserve. I forget which of my smtp
>>>>>>>>> options it insists on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *From:* "Michael L. Scott via SG5" <sg5_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>>>>> *Date:* February 3, 2020 at 8:33:03 PM EST
>>>>>>>>> *To:* sg5_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* "Michael L. Scott" <mlscott_at_[hidden]>,
>>>>>>>>> meeting_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* *Re: [SG5] SG5 in Prague*
>>>>>>>>> *Reply-To:* sg5_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sadly, this has become a bad meeting time for me. I teach from
>>>>>>>>> 2:00-3:15 Eastern Time this semester.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Michael
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2020, at 8:15 PM, Hans Boehm via SG5 <
>>>>>>>>> sg5_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SG5 will not meet in Prague, since most of the regulars will not
>>>>>>>>> be in attendance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I do expect we will have our regularly scheduled teleconference at
>>>>>>>>> 10:30am PST on Thursday before the meeting, and I'm hoping for some SG1
>>>>>>>>> discussion of P2066 which somewhat unexpectedly materialized in the
>>>>>>>>> mailing. (Thanks, Jens!)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SG5_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> SG5 mailing list
>>>>>>>>> SG5_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg5
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>