Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:42:21 +0100
I teach to use those optionals as replacements for pointers and I
introduce optional before pointers as a means to return from a
potentially failing function.
Sorry for the noise.
Peter.
Victor Eijkhout wrote on 27.01.22 14:34:
>
>
>> On , 2022Jan27, at 05:42, Peter C++ <peter.cpp_at_[hidden]
>> <mailto:peter.cpp_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> use boost::optional or tl::optional or jss::object_ptr if you insist
>> of seeing pointer
>
> Is this still about teaching?
>
> Victor.
>
introduce optional before pointers as a means to return from a
potentially failing function.
Sorry for the noise.
Peter.
Victor Eijkhout wrote on 27.01.22 14:34:
>
>
>> On , 2022Jan27, at 05:42, Peter C++ <peter.cpp_at_[hidden]
>> <mailto:peter.cpp_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> use boost::optional or tl::optional or jss::object_ptr if you insist
>> of seeing pointer
>
> Is this still about teaching?
>
> Victor.
>
-- Peter Sommerlad Better Software: Consulting, Training, Reviews Modern, Safe & Agile C++ peter.cpp_at_[hidden] +41 79 432 23 32
Received on 2022-01-27 13:42:24