Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 18:10:57 +0200
On 7/10/26 23:37, Vinnie Falco wrote:
> The SC22 stuff is quite new to me, but you probably know it quite well; could a "New Work Item Proposal" succeed for a separate collection of standardized C++ libraries, to satisfy the particular segment of stakeholders who simply cannot use third party libraries? It would also relieve some of the library standardization pressure on WG21.
Personally, I don't think spreading C++ library review bandwidth across
more than one SC22 Working Group gets us the best outcome.
But I have no idea how National Bodies would react if a suggestion to
create a new C++-related Working Group, disjoint from WG21, were floated.
Jens
> The SC22 stuff is quite new to me, but you probably know it quite well; could a "New Work Item Proposal" succeed for a separate collection of standardized C++ libraries, to satisfy the particular segment of stakeholders who simply cannot use third party libraries? It would also relieve some of the library standardization pressure on WG21.
Personally, I don't think spreading C++ library review bandwidth across
more than one SC22 Working Group gets us the best outcome.
But I have no idea how National Bodies would react if a suggestion to
create a new C++-related Working Group, disjoint from WG21, were floated.
Jens
Received on 2026-07-13 16:11:00