Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:54:53 +0000
I just remembered that we don't typically have meetings in the month of daylight savings changes. I assume it won't happen.
________________________________
From: SG19 <sg19-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf of Phil Ratzloff via SG19 <sg19_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 5:26 PM
To: sg19_at_[hidden] <sg19_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Phil Ratzloff <Phil.Ratzloff_at_[hidden]>
Subject: [isocpp-sg19] SG19 meeting on Thursday?
EXTERNAL
Is there a SG19 meeting on Thursday?
For graph, we have a new draft of P3337 Comparison paper that compares the library in performance against boost::graph and NWGraph.
If Andrew is able to attend, he should be able to review the changes he's made to P3126 and P3127.
I've made some progress on the descriptors in the implementation. Once that's done to demonstrate its use, I can fold the results into the papers.
________________________________
From: SG19 <sg19-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf of Phil Ratzloff via SG19 <sg19_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 5:26 PM
To: sg19_at_[hidden] <sg19_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Phil Ratzloff <Phil.Ratzloff_at_[hidden]>
Subject: [isocpp-sg19] SG19 meeting on Thursday?
EXTERNAL
Is there a SG19 meeting on Thursday?
For graph, we have a new draft of P3337 Comparison paper that compares the library in performance against boost::graph and NWGraph.
If Andrew is able to attend, he should be able to review the changes he's made to P3126 and P3127.
I've made some progress on the descriptors in the implementation. Once that's done to demonstrate its use, I can fold the results into the papers.
Received on 2025-03-12 15:54:58