Roger and BSI, Thanks for the great feedback. We SG19 will look at this
feedback this Thursday on our regular call at 2-4 pm ET. Cheers.

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 5:20 PM Roger Orr <rogero_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hello Michael,
> as you will see from the minutes, the BSI briefly discussed P1709R4 "Graph
> Library" today.
> You are listed as an author, so we are directing our feedback to you in
> the first instance!
>
> As Oliver (Rosten) said "The basic premise is important, and it would be
> fantastic to have support for graphs in the standard."
>
> The main items identified were:
> Oliver:
> - This paper is long and incomplete, it has lots of details which I think
> to be irrelevant, however things that are definitely relevant are missing
> from the paper - for example definition of graph - since people have
> different ideas. We need to add a mathematical perspective to the paper.
>
> - The structure of the paper completely changed in the new revision, so
> now it’s hard to understand what and why they have done
>
> - Another missing part is discussion of graph invariants
>
> Tom (Deakin): There’s a big missing part in “Prior art” part, GraphBLAS (
> https://graphblas.org) eminently.
>
> Best wishes,
> Roger.
>