On 6/22/26 19:59, Jan Schultke wrote:
>
> All, as SG9 chair I just want to remind everybody that the feature is
> *tiny*. The specification is longer than the implementation. Please
> consider whether it is really worth it to spend this much energy on
> discussing it or whether we should just focus on adding useful things.
>
>
> We also spent like 20 hours of LEWG time discussing how to rename or
> replace std::nontype, but the fact that the wording diff could have been
> expressed using a single sentence didn't stop you from writing two paper
> revisions about the subject, did it? :)
>

I said "as a chair" not "as a committee member" ;)