> All, as SG9 chair I just want to remind everybody that the feature is
> *tiny*. The specification is longer than the implementation. Please
> consider whether it is really worth it to spend this much energy on
> discussing it or whether we should just focus on adding useful things.
>

We also spent like 20 hours of LEWG time discussing how to rename or
replace std::nontype, but the fact that the wording diff could have been
expressed using a single sentence didn't stop you from writing two paper
revisions about the subject, did it? :)