P3365 <https://wg21.link/p3365> is "Remove the Deprecated iterator Class
Template from C++26". I don't see a reason for SG16 to weigh in on that
proposal, so I'm guessing you have a different proposal in mind.

Tom.

On 8/27/24 12:04 PM, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
> Likewise, could I add https://wg21.link/p3365 to the queue?
>
> SG16 has already expressed a view on this content, as noted in the
> paper, but LEWG sent it back seeking your long term recommendations,
> not just for C++26.
>
> As a group, they are still open to both the idea of undeprecation and
> removal, and knowing our long term goal will inform them sufficiently
> to decide whether they choose to take action early, either way, while
> acknowledging SG16’s recommendation to defer.
>
> AlisdairM
> อลิสแดร์ม
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Aug 27, 2024, at 11:19, Corentin Jabot via SG16
>> <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Take care Tom!
>>
>> I'd like to talk about P2019 <http://wg21.link/p2019> when we have
>> the chance - maybe if we have extra time on the 11th?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 5:03 PM Tom Honermann via SG16
>> <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> With apologies, I have canceled tomorrow's SG16 meeting due to my
>> own time constraints. I need to recoup some time again and I
>> still haven't caught up with my outstanding SG16 chair
>> obligations. With summer over and kids back in school, I hope to
>> be caught up again soon.
>>
>> We will next meet on September 11th and I expect the agenda to
>> include discussion of P2319R0 (Prevent path presentation
>> problems) <https://wg21.link/p2319r0>.
>>
>> Tom.
>>
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16