This is your friendly reminder that this meeting is taking place tomorrow.

Tom.

On 2/3/24 11:24 PM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
>
> SG16 will hold a meeting on Wednesday, February 7th, at 19:30 UTC
> (timezone conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20240207T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pst&p3=tz_mst&p4=tz_cst&p5=tz_est&p6=tz_cet>).
>
> The agenda follows.
>
> * Updates from the Unicode liaison from the UTC #178 meeting.
> * CWG 2843: Undated reference to Unicode makes C++ a moving target
> <https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2843.html>.
> * P2845R6: Formatting of std::filesystem::path
> <https://wg21.link/p2845r6>.
> * P3070R0: Formatting enums <https://wg21.link/p3070r0>.
>
> The UTC #178 meeting took place January 23-25th (agenda
> <https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2024/24005.htm>, draft minutes
> <https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2024/24006.htm>). Robin will provide a
> brief report of anything of significant SG16 interest. I am aware of
> at least one interesting development!
>
> We last discussed CWG 2843 during the 2024-01-10 SG16 meeting
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings?tab=readme-ov-file#january-10th-2024>
> in which we established consensus for use of a dated reference to the
> Unicode Standard, a mandatory minimum Unicode version requirement, and
> an allowance for implementors to use an implementation-defined later
> version. We have yet to provide recommendations for the following:
>
> 1. The version of the Unicode Standard to be specified as the
> mandatory minimum version.
> 2. Whether implementations are allowed to use different
> implementation-defined Unicode versions for the core language and
> the standard library.
> 3. Whether the implementation-defined Unicode version should be
> exposed via a new feature test macro (perhaps two new feature test
> macros depending on the previous item).
>
> Review of P2845R6 and P3070R0 was requested by Victor with a goal of
> having an SG16 position established for them ahead of the Tokyo meeting.
>
> We previously reviewed and agreed to forward P2845R3 to LEWG during
> the 2023-09-13 SG16 meeting
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/blob/master/README-2023.md#september-13th-2023>.
> Some minor changes have been made following LEWG and LWG review that
> Victor would like SG16 to review. Please familiarize yourselves with
> the changes made in the later revisions.
>
> P3070R0 proposes a std::format() enhancement to enable values of one
> type to be easily formatted as values of another type without having
> to write a std::formatter specialization. I don't see any obvious SG16
> concerns in the proposal, but we'll review to socialize the new
> feature and provide an opportunity for others to identify any SG16
> concerns that I missed.
>
> Tom.
>
>