Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:30:48 -0500
The summary for the SG16 meeting held January 10th, 2024 is now
available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.
* https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-10th-2024
The following polls were taken following the discussion of CWG 2843
(Undated reference to Unicode makes C++ a moving target)
<https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2843.html>:
* *Poll 1: Recommend having a dated reference to Unicode in the
"Normative references" and add permission to implement an
implementation-defined version.*
o Attendees: 10
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* *Poll 2: The standard shall specify a mandatory minimum Unicode
version.*
o Attendees: 10
SF F N A SA
3 5 1 1 0
o Consensus in favor
o A: I would prefer to allow implementations to use older Unicode
versions and still be considered conforming; implementations
will do so regardless.
Further discussion of CWG 2843 is planned for the 2024-02-07 SG16 meeting.
Tom.
available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.
* https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#january-10th-2024
The following polls were taken following the discussion of CWG 2843
(Undated reference to Unicode makes C++ a moving target)
<https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2843.html>:
* *Poll 1: Recommend having a dated reference to Unicode in the
"Normative references" and add permission to implement an
implementation-defined version.*
o Attendees: 10
o No objection to unanimous consent.
* *Poll 2: The standard shall specify a mandatory minimum Unicode
version.*
o Attendees: 10
SF F N A SA
3 5 1 1 0
o Consensus in favor
o A: I would prefer to allow implementations to use older Unicode
versions and still be considered conforming; implementations
will do so regardless.
Further discussion of CWG 2843 is planned for the 2024-02-07 SG16 meeting.
Tom.
Received on 2024-01-29 02:30:53