C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: SG16 meeting summary for May 24th, 2023

From: Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 03:39:51 -0400
For the minutes, an important note that is missing from the P2871R0 review is that just before we asked for consensus, I observed that this is the facility that lies in its name and uses UCS-2 rather than UTF-16. I know that was important to persuading Jens!

AlisdairM

> On May 26, 2023, at 3:35 AM, Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> The summary for the SG16 meeting held May 24th, 2023 is now available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.
>
> https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#may-24th-2023
> No new decisions were made at this meeting, but we did reconfirm prior consensus for no objection to removal of the deprecated facilities as proposed in the following papers. See the polls associated with review of P2139R2 (Reviewing Deprecated Facilities of C++20 for C++23) <https://wg21.link/p2139r2> during the 2020-07-22 SG16 meeting <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/blob/master/README-2020.md#july-22nd-2020>.
>
> P2871R0: Remove Deprecated Unicode Conversion Facets From C++26 <https://wg21.link/p2871r0>
> P2873R0: Remove Deprecated Locale Category Facets For Unicode from C++26 <https://wg21.link/p2873r0>
> Tom.
>
>


Received on 2023-05-27 07:40:19