Thanks Jens, it sounds like a bad early draft got uploaded by mistake. I will post a corrected D2872R1 tonight.

AlisdairM
Sent from my iPhone

> On May 22, 2023, at 12:26, Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> 
>
>> On 22/05/2023 16.45, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 wrote:
>> Sorry, intended to post these links last Friday:
>>
>> The “parent” paper recommends taking no action on `filesystem::u8path`, D.29:
>> Review Annex D for C++26
>> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2863R0.html
>
> "No action": fine with me.
>
>> The next two papers are clearly for SG21 to comment on:
>>
>> Remove Deprecated Unicode Conversion Facets From C++26
>> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2871R0.pdf
>
> I'm slightly hesitant here, given that the replacement
> (e.g. Zach's UTF transformation paper) isn't in yet.
>
>> Remove Deprecated Locale Category Facets For Unicode from C++26
>> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2873R0.pdf
>
> That seems to be intimately tied into the other facility.
> Anyway, these particular locale facets can go, in my view.
> (As a locale facet, it has no purpose.)
>
>> I am sending this one to SG21 to decide if SG21 should comment, or defer straight to the library groups:
>>
>> Remove `wstring_convert` From C++26
>> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2872R0.pdf
>
> The title is "Remove wstring_convert From C++26" but the text of
> the paper contains
>
> "This paper takes up the deprecated C-style API for race-free access to shared_ptr objects, D.24
> [depr.util.smartptr.shared.atomic]."
>
> I'm confused.
>
> Also, this paper is missing wording and it would be good if there were
> at least a few sentences on what the facility is intending to do.
>
> Jens
>
>
>
>>
>> I believe that is all the Annex D material that may be of concern to this study group, but feel free to audit the “parent” paper in case I missed something.
>>
>> AlisdairM
>>
>>
>>>> On May 21, 2023, at 9:35 PM, Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Alisdair. Do you have links you can share available now? I'd like for people to have a couple of days to review before we meet on Wednesday.
>>>
>>> Tom.
>>>
>>> On 5/9/23 6:23 PM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 wrote:
>>>> Ack. I will have links no later than this weekend, although may be pushing up to the Monday AM deadline ;)
>>>>
>>>> AlisdairM
>>>>
>>>>> On May 8, 2023, at 11:47 AM, Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 8, 2023, at 9:15 AM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope to have my paper reviewing Annex D deprecated facilities into the
>>>>>> May mailing, and it would be helpful to have SG16 review the Unicode
>>>>>> related features by telecom before the Varna meeting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For reference, that would be D26, D28, and D29. I don’t think D27 comes
>>>>>> this way, but we might want to take a quick look just to confirm that!
>>>>> We should be able to accommodate that review at our May 24th meeting. Please share a link as soon as the paper is ready!
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom.
>>>>>
>>>>>> AlisdairM
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 4, 2023, at 3:06 PM, Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter and I discussed plans for Varna and have decided not to hold an in-person meeting that week. Neither Peter nor I will be physically present and several SG16 regular attendees would be unable to attend any time other than an evening session (which would mean no polling). Thus, we don't expect to have quorum. We're continuing to make good progress with our regular telecons and have an excellent track record with papers we have forwarded to LEWG and EWG, so I have no concerns that we'll continue to make good progress.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tom.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> SG16 mailing list
>>>>>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> SG16 mailing list
>>>>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>