Am Fr., 28. Apr. 2023 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb Corentin Jabot
<corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>:
>
> I had forgotten about that discussion, sorry.
>
> I did make that change to "possibly const qualified char*" which of course is not what we want to say. So it was suggested I use the "cv" wording instead.
>
> I changed it to "pointer to possibly const-qualified char".

Thanks,

- Daniel