C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Agenda for the 2023-01-11 SG16 telecon​

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:51:10 -0500
This is your friendly reminder that this meeting is taking place tomorrow.


On 1/8/23 1:01 AM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
> SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, January 11th, at 19:30 UTC
> (timezone conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20230111T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pst&p3=tz_mst&p4=tz_cst&p5=tz_est&p6=tz_cet>).
> The agenda follows.
> * Planning for Issaquah.
> * P2736R0 <https://wg21.link/p2736r0>: Referencing the Unicode Standard.
> * D2749R0 <https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2749R0.pdf>: Down with
> ”character”
> The WG21 Issaquah meeting will take place from February 6th through
> the 11th. I am planning to hold a SG16 meeting that week, but as of
> now, neither I nor Peter are planning to attend in person. I asked
> Steve if he would be willing to help facilitate attendance for
> in-person attendees and for some reason he thought that would be fun,
> so I'm going to try and hold him to it. Thanks, Steve! We'll discuss
> how many SG16 regulars are likely to be attending in person, what kind
> of setup we'll want, what day we would like to meet and for how long.
> We started discussing P2736R0 (Referencing the Unicode Standard)
> during the 2022-12-14 SG16 telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#december-14th-2022>.
> Most of that discussion was concerned with the __STDC_ISO_10646__
> macro. We'll continue from there with a goal of completing review so
> that we can poll forwarding the paper. This paper is intended to
> resolve two of the three remaining NB comments tagged for SG16
> <https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Asg16>
> (FR-021-013 <https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/423> and
> FR-010-133 <https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/412>).
> D2749R0 (Down with ”character”) seeks to resolve, FR-020-014
> <https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/422>, the last NB
> comment tagged for SG16. We last discussed that NB comment during the
> 2022-12-14 SG16 telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#december-14th-2022>
> where we agreed to encourage Corentin to do more work and, lo and
> behold, we now owe him a review.
> Tom.

Received on 2023-01-10 21:51:11