Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2022 16:46:25 +0000
[cpp.predefined]
"The specified year and month are implementation-defined."
-> "The value is implementation-defined."
I would prefer if we could repurpose that macro to refer to the supported
Unicode version instead (by its release year/month).
[mzeren] Could we say that any date past a well-known, yet to be determined, date refers instead to Unicode?
"The specified year and month are implementation-defined."
-> "The value is implementation-defined."
I would prefer if we could repurpose that macro to refer to the supported
Unicode version instead (by its release year/month).
[mzeren] Could we say that any date past a well-known, yet to be determined, date refers instead to Unicode?
Received on 2022-12-04 16:46:29