On 11/9/22 1:49 AM, Hubert Tong via Core wrote:
> Does it make sense to anticipate that we may want \N{} escapes within
> n-char sequences someday and allow nested brace pairs today to reduce
> churn?

That did not occur to me when drafting the proposed change. I'm not
opposed to such a change, but I don't see much potential for ever taking
advantage of it either. I can see some potential for allowing names from
other character naming sources (as previously discussed with P2071
<https://wg21.link/p2071>), but I don't think '{' or '}' are currently
used in any common character name sources. If motivation arises, I
suspect the concern can be addressed then with minimal churn.

Tom.

>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2640.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Core mailing list
> Core_at_[hidden]
> Subscription:https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/core
> Link to this post:http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2022/11/13471.php