Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 22:30:27 -0400
The summary for the SG16 meeting held November 2nd, 2022 is now
available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.
* https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/#november-2nd-2022
The following polls were taken:
* Poll 1: [FR 005-134
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/408>]: SG16 recommends
accepting the comment in the direction presented in the first bullet
of the proposed change and as recommended in the polls for US 38-098.
o Attendees: 8
o Unanimous consent
* Poll 2: [FR-009-024
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/411>]: SG16 recommends
rejecting the comment on the basis that explicit indication of
Unicode requirement conformance, non-conformance, or inapplicability
is useful.
o Attendees: 9 (1 abstention)
o
SF
F
N
A
SA
3
3
1
0
1
o Consensus.
* Poll 3: [FR-010-133
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/412>][FR-021-013
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/423>]: SG16 requests
that the project editor discuss with the ISO the option of eschewing
references to ISO/IEC 10646 in favor of the Unicode Standard both
for technical consistency and release frequency.
o Attendees: 9 (1 abstention)
o
SF
F
N
A
SA
3
3
0
1
1
o Weak consensus
* Poll 4: [FR-010-133
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/412>][FR-021-013
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/423>]: SG16 recommends
resolving these comments by restricting all references to the
Unicode Standard to the version that corresponds to the referenced
version of ISO/IEC 10646.
o Attendees: 9 (1 abstention)
o
SF
F
N
A
SA
2
3
0
3
0
o No consensus.
These poll results have been recorded in the nbballot github repository
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot>.
Tom.
available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections.
* https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/#november-2nd-2022
The following polls were taken:
* Poll 1: [FR 005-134
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/408>]: SG16 recommends
accepting the comment in the direction presented in the first bullet
of the proposed change and as recommended in the polls for US 38-098.
o Attendees: 8
o Unanimous consent
* Poll 2: [FR-009-024
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/411>]: SG16 recommends
rejecting the comment on the basis that explicit indication of
Unicode requirement conformance, non-conformance, or inapplicability
is useful.
o Attendees: 9 (1 abstention)
o
SF
F
N
A
SA
3
3
1
0
1
o Consensus.
* Poll 3: [FR-010-133
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/412>][FR-021-013
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/423>]: SG16 requests
that the project editor discuss with the ISO the option of eschewing
references to ISO/IEC 10646 in favor of the Unicode Standard both
for technical consistency and release frequency.
o Attendees: 9 (1 abstention)
o
SF
F
N
A
SA
3
3
0
1
1
o Weak consensus
* Poll 4: [FR-010-133
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/412>][FR-021-013
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/423>]: SG16 recommends
resolving these comments by restricting all references to the
Unicode Standard to the version that corresponds to the referenced
version of ISO/IEC 10646.
o Attendees: 9 (1 abstention)
o
SF
F
N
A
SA
2
3
0
3
0
o No consensus.
These poll results have been recorded in the nbballot github repository
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot>.
Tom.
Received on 2022-11-06 02:30:31