Wow, thanks for the extensive research!

- Victor

On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 8:53 AM Corentin Jabot <corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> https://wg21.link/p2675
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022, 17:19 Victor Zverovich via SG16 <
> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> As discussed in the thread about LWG3780, while the direction seems
>> promising I don't think we should accept the resolution without a more
>> detailed analysis of the impact of the proposed extensive changes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Victor
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 8:55 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
>> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Please review the following. If you agree with the proposed change and
>>> have no further information to add, then there is no need to respond. If
>>> you disagree with the proposed change, have corrections or new information
>>> to offer, or have comments on the candidate polls, then *please reply
>>> by Monday, October 31st*. FR 22.14.2.2 [format.string.std]
>>> <http://eel.is/c++draft/format.string.std> codepoints with width 2
>>>
>>> GitHub nbballot issue #409
>>> <https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/409>.
>>> LWG issue 3780 <https://wg21.link/lwg3780>.
>>> P2675R0: LWG 3780: The Paper (format's width estimation is too
>>> approximate and not forward compatible) <https://wg21.link/p2675r0>.
>>> Comment:
>>>
>>> The range of codepoints to be considered of width 2 is not compatible
>>> with recent and future unicode versions.
>>> Proposed change:
>>>
>>> Please adopt LWG3780 for C++23, backported to C++20
>>> SG16 chair notes:
>>>
>>> Thank you to Corentin for filing LWG issue 3780
>>> <https://wg21.link/lwg3780> and for authoring P2675
>>> <https://wg21.link/p2675> in response to requests for a more thorough
>>> analysis of the consequences of the proposal.
>>> Candidate polls:
>>>
>>> - [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends resolving the comment by adopting P2675R0
>>> <https://wg21.link/p2675r0>.
>>> - [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment but encourages
>>> consideration of P2675R0 <https://wg21.link/p2675r0> for a future
>>> standard.
>>> - [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment as not a defect.
>>>
>>> Tom.
>>> --
>>> SG16 mailing list
>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>>
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>