C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: NB comment review: FR 22.14.2.2 [format.string.std] codepoints with width 2

From: Corentin Jabot <corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 17:52:54 +0200
https://wg21.link/p2675

On Sat, Oct 29, 2022, 17:19 Victor Zverovich via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> As discussed in the thread about LWG3780, while the direction seems
> promising I don't think we should accept the resolution without a more
> detailed analysis of the impact of the proposed extensive changes.
>
> Cheers,
> Victor
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 8:55 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Please review the following. If you agree with the proposed change and
>> have no further information to add, then there is no need to respond. If
>> you disagree with the proposed change, have corrections or new information
>> to offer, or have comments on the candidate polls, then *please reply by
>> Monday, October 31st*. FR 22.14.2.2 [format.string.std]
>> <http://eel.is/c++draft/format.string.std> codepoints with width 2
>>
>> GitHub nbballot issue #409
>> <https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/409>.
>> LWG issue 3780 <https://wg21.link/lwg3780>.
>> P2675R0: LWG 3780: The Paper (format's width estimation is too
>> approximate and not forward compatible) <https://wg21.link/p2675r0>.
>> Comment:
>>
>> The range of codepoints to be considered of width 2 is not compatible
>> with recent and future unicode versions.
>> Proposed change:
>>
>> Please adopt LWG3780 for C++23, backported to C++20
>> SG16 chair notes:
>>
>> Thank you to Corentin for filing LWG issue 3780
>> <https://wg21.link/lwg3780> and for authoring P2675
>> <https://wg21.link/p2675> in response to requests for a more thorough
>> analysis of the consequences of the proposal.
>> Candidate polls:
>>
>> - [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends resolving the comment by adopting P2675R0
>> <https://wg21.link/p2675r0>.
>> - [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment but encourages
>> consideration of P2675R0 <https://wg21.link/p2675r0> for a future
>> standard.
>> - [FR-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment as not a defect.
>>
>> Tom.
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>

Received on 2022-10-29 15:53:06