Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:56:53 -0400
Please review the following. If you agree with the proposed change and
have no further information to add, then there is no need to respond. If
you disagree with the proposed change, have corrections or new
information to offer, or have comments on the candidate polls, then
*please reply by Monday, October 31st*.
GB 5.2 [lex.phases] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases> Clarification
of wording on new-line and whitespace
GitHub nbballot issue #432
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/432>.
Comment:
Clarification of wording on new-line and whitespace.
The specification of new-line and whitespace should be updated following
changes to the C++ working paper, such as P2314 adopted in Oct 2021.
Proposed change:
We propose adopting a revision of P2348 ("Whitespaces Wording Revamp").
SG16 chair notes:
Did SG16 review P2348? I can't recall.
Link to CWG review of P2348.
Candidate polls:
* [GB-XX]: SG16 recommends accepting the comment in the direction of
the proposed change.
* [GB-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment as not a defect.
Tom.
have no further information to add, then there is no need to respond. If
you disagree with the proposed change, have corrections or new
information to offer, or have comments on the candidate polls, then
*please reply by Monday, October 31st*.
GB 5.2 [lex.phases] <http://eel.is/c++draft/lex.phases> Clarification
of wording on new-line and whitespace
GitHub nbballot issue #432
<https://github.com/cplusplus/nbballot/issues/432>.
Comment:
Clarification of wording on new-line and whitespace.
The specification of new-line and whitespace should be updated following
changes to the C++ working paper, such as P2314 adopted in Oct 2021.
Proposed change:
We propose adopting a revision of P2348 ("Whitespaces Wording Revamp").
SG16 chair notes:
Did SG16 review P2348? I can't recall.
Link to CWG review of P2348.
Candidate polls:
* [GB-XX]: SG16 recommends accepting the comment in the direction of
the proposed change.
* [GB-XX]: SG16 recommends rejecting the comment as not a defect.
Tom.
Received on 2022-10-26 15:56:56