On 14/09/2022 03.44, Corentin Jabot via SG16 wrote:
> After more looking, we managed to have no less than 4 distinct unicode versions referenced.
>
> Good news:
> The normative reference is floating and correct http://eel.is/c++draft/intro.refs <http://eel.is/c++draft/intro.refs> - so XID_ properties point to 15.
> Less good news, ISO/IEC 10646 currently points to 13.0, so technically the names for\N{} do not cover 14/15. Fortunately, implementers derive the names from UnicodeData.txt
>
> The non normative reference (bibliography) needs fixing editorially(?).
> I made a PR https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/5826 <https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/pull/5826>

From an editorial standpoint, I'd like some review whether there
were material changes in the Unicode stuff affecting our
use of this material and thus interacting with updating
the bibliography entries.

Jens