On 5/25/22 4:02 AM, Peter Brett wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thank you for this updated draft.
>
> It would be useful to have a column in the table that shows the
> proposed conforming behaviour.
>
I presume you mean in the table in the "Existing practice" section. I
didn't add a column there because 1) the table is already fairly wide,
2) the proposed behavior isn't described until a later section, and 3)
the additional column would exactly duplicate the gcc and MSVC columns.

Would it help if I updated the "Proposal" section as follows?

    Standardize the behavior exhibited by gcc with fmt and MSVC_as
    demonstrated in the "Existing practice" section_:

If not, is there another way I can satisfy what you are looking for?

Tom.

> Thanks,
>
> Peter
>
> *From:*SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> *On Behalf Of *Tom
> Honermann via SG16
> *Sent:* 25 May 2022 05:23
> *To:* SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
> *Cc:* Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* [SG16] Updated draft of P2572R0: std::format() fill
> character allowances
>
> EXTERNAL MAIL
>
> An updated draft of P2572R0 (std::format() fill character allowances)
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/raw.githack.com/tahonermann/std-proposals/master/d2572r0.html__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!EyAyxxLfS9do3u8AAkRoUx6REuFYxZUqG3cFjuGOwHqnZVR_J7GCqX4IRN-Cleu1T4TROD8il-sDcPM$>
> is now available.
>
> The following changes have been made relative to the previously
> reviewed draft
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/rawcdn.githack.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/c84e3e4eef341795fb9ac44824525a3a89583fa7/presentations/2022-04-13-d2572r0.html__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!EyAyxxLfS9do3u8AAkRoUx6REuFYxZUqG3cFjuGOwHqnZVR_J7GCqX4IRN-Cleu1T4TROD8iDMIEYIY$>.
>
> * The proposal was modified to align with the outcome of our last
> review
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings*april-13th-2022__;Iw!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!EyAyxxLfS9do3u8AAkRoUx6REuFYxZUqG3cFjuGOwHqnZVR_J7GCqX4IRN-Cleu1T4TROD8ikWL3fag$>.
> It now seeks to standardize the behavior exhibited by gcc and MSVC.
> * Wording was updated to align with the proposal direction.
> * The character examples were extended to include the delete
> character and a right-to-left directional character (Hebrew letter
> tav).
> * The "Estimated display width restrictions" section was expanded to
> discuss the option of producing an error only when the requested
> field alignment cannot be achieved.
> * The "Existing practice" section was updated to include character
> names, example behavior for the delete and Hebrew letter tav
> characters, and an additional note about handling of right-to-left
> characters.
> * The "Existing practice" section was updated to note that the
> previously reported buffer overflow that occurs with MSVC 19.31
> has been fixed for the next release and to include an example of
> the diagnostic that is now issued.
> * A new "Future considerations and ABI" section has been added.
> * The "Implementation experience" section has been updated to note
> that, now that the paper seeks to standardize the current gcc and
> MSVC behavior, that the proposal has been implemented (with the
> exception of some possible ABI break mitigations that may or may
> not be misguided).
>
> Tom.
>