On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:03 PM Victor Zverovich <victor.zverovich_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> What do you expect to see in the new paper compared to P2549? I don't have
> a strong opinion regarding this issue but can update the paper to whatever
> LEWG wants.
>

Given the change has some support, someone (and it doesn't have to be you)
will have to provide some wording for it to be pursued,
I guess Peter wants to see some benchmarks and/or a deeper analysis of the
tradeoff.

Is that something you are volunteering to work on?


>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:55 AM Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Is anyone volunteering to write a paper for that?
>> Bonus points for providing an implementation
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:08 PM Tomasz Kamiński <tomaszkam_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> (Given Tim's example)
>>>
>>> W dniu 28.03.2022 o 19:09, Inbal Levi via Lib-Ext pisze:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>> Today we have a paper in a bit of a different format (😉) -
>>> this is an *Info* paper, which the fmt library author wrote to notify
>>> LEWG of the current behaviour.
>>> Currently there's *no action* suggested in the paper, but we would like the
>>> author to *get an indication on the amount of support for the status
>>> quo, as well as **whether a change is needed.*
>>>
>>> P2539R0: Should the output of std::print to a terminal be synchronized
>>> with the underlying stream? (wg21.link/P2539)
>>> by: Victor Zverovich
>>>
>>> ***
>>> * From the Discussion:*
>>> To prevent mojibake std::print may use a native Unicode API when
>>> writing to a terminal bypassing the stream buffer. During the review of
>>> [P2093]
>>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2539r0.html#biblio-p2093> "Formatted
>>> output" Tim Song suggested that synchronizing std::print with the
>>> underlying stream may be beneficial for gradual adoption.
>>>
>>> *Some meta data:*
>>>
>>> - *Bottom Line: *Neither {fmt} ([FMT]) nor Rust ([RUST-STDIO]) do
>>> such synchronization in their implementations of print.
>>> - To indicate your opinion on whether a change is needed (reasoning
>>> is, of course, welcome):
>>> - If you support the status quo (no change): please response with *"No
>>> Change"*
>>> - If you think a change is needed (synchronize the output with
>>> the underlying steam): please response* "+1"*
>>>
>>> ***
>>>
>>> * Weekly reviews improve quality!*
>>> Running weekly reviews allows more iterations on each proposal, which
>>> hopefully, in turn, will result in more accurate and subtle fixes.
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal,
>>> and have a great week!
>>>
>>> Inbal Levi
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lib-Ext mailing listLib-Ext_at_[hidden]
>>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib-ext
>>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/2022/03/22838.php
>>>
>>>
>>>