What do you expect to see in the new paper compared to P2549? I don't have
a strong opinion regarding this issue but can update the paper to whatever
LEWG wants.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:55 AM Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Is anyone volunteering to write a paper for that?
> Bonus points for providing an implementation
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 8:08 PM Tomasz Kamiński <tomaszkam_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>> (Given Tim's example)
>>
>> W dniu 28.03.2022 o 19:09, Inbal Levi via Lib-Ext pisze:
>>
>> Hello all,
>> Today we have a paper in a bit of a different format (😉) -
>> this is an *Info* paper, which the fmt library author wrote to notify
>> LEWG of the current behaviour.
>> Currently there's *no action* suggested in the paper, but we would like the
>> author to *get an indication on the amount of support for the status
>> quo, as well as **whether a change is needed.*
>>
>> P2539R0: Should the output of std::print to a terminal be synchronized
>> with the underlying stream? (wg21.link/P2539)
>> by: Victor Zverovich
>>
>> ***
>> * From the Discussion:*
>> To prevent mojibake std::print may use a native Unicode API when writing
>> to a terminal bypassing the stream buffer. During the review of [P2093]
>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2539r0.html#biblio-p2093> "Formatted
>> output" Tim Song suggested that synchronizing std::print with the
>> underlying stream may be beneficial for gradual adoption.
>>
>> *Some meta data:*
>>
>> - *Bottom Line: *Neither {fmt} ([FMT]) nor Rust ([RUST-STDIO]) do
>> such synchronization in their implementations of print.
>> - To indicate your opinion on whether a change is needed (reasoning
>> is, of course, welcome):
>> - If you support the status quo (no change): please response with *"No
>> Change"*
>> - If you think a change is needed (synchronize the output with the
>> underlying steam): please response* "+1"*
>>
>> ***
>>
>> * Weekly reviews improve quality!*
>> Running weekly reviews allows more iterations on each proposal, which
>> hopefully, in turn, will result in more accurate and subtle fixes.
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal,
>> and have a great week!
>>
>> Inbal Levi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lib-Ext mailing listLib-Ext_at_[hidden]
>> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib-ext
>> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/2022/03/22838.php
>>
>>
>>