+1
(Given Tim's example)

W dniu 28.03.2022 o 19:09, Inbal Levi via Lib-Ext pisze:
> Hello all,
> Today we have a paper in a bit of a different format (😉) -
> this is an *Info* paper, which the fmt library author wrote to notify
> LEWG of the current behaviour.
> Currently there's *no action* suggested in the paper, but we would
> like**the author to *get an indication on the amount of support for
> the status quo, as well as **whether a change is needed.*
>
> P2539R0: Should the output of std::print to a terminal be synchronized
> with the underlying stream? (wg21.link/P2539 <http://wg21.link/P2539>)
> by: Victor Zverovich
>
> *** *
> From the Discussion:*
> To prevent mojibake |std::print| may use a native Unicode API when
> writing to a terminal bypassing the stream buffer. During the review
> of [P2093]
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2539r0.html#biblio-p2093> "Formatted
> output" Tim Song suggested that synchronizing |std::print| with the
> underlying stream may be beneficial for gradual adoption.
> *
> *
> *Some meta data:*
>
> * *Bottom Line: *Neither {fmt} ([FMT]) nor Rust ([RUST-STDIO]) do
> such synchronization in their implementations of |print|.
> * To indicate your opinion on whether a change is needed (reasoning
> is, of course, welcome):
> o If you support the status quo (no change): please response
> with *"No Change"*
> o If you think a change is needed (synchronize the output with
> the underlying steam): please response* "+1"*
>
> ***
> *
> Weekly reviews improve quality!*
> Running weekly reviews allows more iterations on each proposal, which
> hopefully, in turn, will result in more accurate and subtle fixes.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal,
> and have a great week!
>
> Inbal Levi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lib-Ext mailing list
> Lib-Ext_at_[hidden]
> Subscription:https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib-ext
> Link to this post:http://lists.isocpp.org/lib-ext/2022/03/22838.php