Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:35:15 +0000
+1
From: SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Corentin via SG16
Sent: 02 December 2021 17:33
Hello,
I was asked, again, to notify you that P2361 (unevaluated string) has been revised http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!WUpAvJo2awTh5iKcs0UyrvO8dP8MLYMJkET2BImenoBFY7IIY9ysAJ8m75qcjA$>
Last couple of times we have seen this, we mostly discussed wording, and my understanding is that we are happy with the design and the intent.
It would make my life easier if that was seen by EWG sooner rather than later.
At Tom's request, can you reply +1 to this paper if you want to see it forwarded to EWG at the next SG-16 meeting?
From: SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Corentin via SG16
Sent: 02 December 2021 17:33
Hello,
I was asked, again, to notify you that P2361 (unevaluated string) has been revised http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!WUpAvJo2awTh5iKcs0UyrvO8dP8MLYMJkET2BImenoBFY7IIY9ysAJ8m75qcjA$>
Last couple of times we have seen this, we mostly discussed wording, and my understanding is that we are happy with the design and the intent.
It would make my life easier if that was seen by EWG sooner rather than later.
At Tom's request, can you reply +1 to this paper if you want to see it forwarded to EWG at the next SG-16 meeting?
Received on 2021-12-02 11:35:24