Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 09:49:32 -0800
+1
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 9:34 AM Corentin via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> I was asked, again, to notify you that P2361 (unevaluated string) has been
> revised
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf
>
> Last couple of times we have seen this, we mostly discussed wording, and
> my understanding is that we are happy with the design and the intent.
>
> It would make my life easier if that was seen by EWG sooner rather than
> later.
>
> At Tom's request, can you reply +1 to this paper if you want to see it
> forwarded to EWG at the next SG-16 meeting?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Corentin
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 9:34 AM Corentin via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Hello,
> I was asked, again, to notify you that P2361 (unevaluated string) has been
> revised
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2361r4.pdf
>
> Last couple of times we have seen this, we mostly discussed wording, and
> my understanding is that we are happy with the design and the intent.
>
> It would make my life easier if that was seen by EWG sooner rather than
> later.
>
> At Tom's request, can you reply +1 to this paper if you want to see it
> forwarded to EWG at the next SG-16 meeting?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Corentin
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
Received on 2021-12-02 11:51:48