SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, November 3rd at 19:30 UTC
(timezone conversion
<https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20211103T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pdt&p3=tz_mdt&p4=tz_cdt&p5=tz_edt&p6=tz_cet>).

*For participants in Europe, please note that daylight savings time ends
2021-10-31, so this telecon will start one hour earlier than our last
telecon (North America time zones don't change until 2021-11-07).
*

The agenda is:

  * D2071R1: Named universal character escapes
      o Continue review pending a revision update.
  * P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of
    meaning <https://wg21.link/p1854r1>
      o New revision review.
  * P2361R3: Unevaluated strings <https://wg21.link/p2361r3>
      o New revision review; we last reviewed this proposal during the
        2021-09-22 telecon
        <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#september-22nd-2021>.

The most recent revision of D2071R1 is attached to the email thread
archived at https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/10/2767.php
<https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/10/2767.php>. Further review of
D2071R1 is pending minor updates to address feedback from the last
telecon as well as wording updates offered on the SG16 mailing list
<https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/10/2766.php>.

We had continued discussion of P1885 <https://wg21.link/p1885> at the
last telecon and had concluded with the intent to conduct some polls at
this upcoming telecon. However, since we had already approved forwarding
of a draft revision of P1885R8 <https://wg21.link/p1885r8> during our
2021-09-22 telecon
<https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#september-22nd-2021>,
LEWG will be proceeding with electronic polling of it (actually, of
P1885R9 <https://wg21.link/p1885r9>; this revision includes a mandate
that CHAR_BIT is 8 for all of the encoding querying functions). As a
result, any further discussion of P1885 concerns is now tabled pending
submission of a new paper that proposes changes to the design specified
in P1885R9. SG16 should now view P1885R9 as the status quo unless LEWG
rejects it.

We last reviewed P1854 in Belfast. Please review the minutes recorded
here <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1854R0> as well as
recent email discussion archived here
<https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/10/2780.php>. Prior polls on this
proposal are located with the minutes for P1885 here
<https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1885R0>. We had
previously decided to block P1854 on P1855 (as noted in those polls).
Now that we have forwarded P1885, P1854 is cleared to proceed.

We last reviewed P2361 during our 2021-09-22 telecon
<https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#september-22nd-2021>.
Please review those notes as well as the new revision.

Tom.