Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:34:30 -0400
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:44 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> SG16 approved forwarding a draft of P2295R5 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5>
> (Support for UTF-8 as a portable source file encoding) and P2362R0
> <https://wg21.link/p2362r0> (Make obfuscating wide character literals
> ill-formed) with minor modifications to EWG during its July 14th telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/blob/master/README.md#july-14th-2021>.
> All requested SG16 changes are present in the published versions of
> P2295R5 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5> and P2362R1
> <https://wg21.link/p2362r1> that appear in the most recent mailing
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/#mailing2021-07>
> (note that P2362R1 <https://wg21.link/p2362r1> sports a new title).
>
> These papers are now ready for review by EWG and the Github issue tracker
> <https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues> has been updated
> accordingly. Both papers have wording that has been reviewed by a core
> expert and each reflects existing implementation practice.
>
I will note that P2295's treatment of end-of-line indicators for UTF-8
source files has not yet been implemented (to my knowledge) on platforms
where text files traditionally have "out-of-band" line length information.
I am not aware of technical limitations that prevent having a convention
that works in the manner P2295 indicates, so this comment is for
information only.
> P2295 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5> has also been reviewed by SG22 (C/C++
> Liaison) and has not been tagged for review by any other SGs. P2362
> <https://wg21.link/p2362> still awaits SG22 review, so I encourage the
> EWG and SG22 chairs to coordinate to determine if EWG review should await
> SG22's review.
>
> Thank you to both authors for the time and patience they exhibited
> throughout the reviews of these papers; particularly with regard to finding
> wording for P2295 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5>.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> SG16 approved forwarding a draft of P2295R5 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5>
> (Support for UTF-8 as a portable source file encoding) and P2362R0
> <https://wg21.link/p2362r0> (Make obfuscating wide character literals
> ill-formed) with minor modifications to EWG during its July 14th telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/blob/master/README.md#july-14th-2021>.
> All requested SG16 changes are present in the published versions of
> P2295R5 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5> and P2362R1
> <https://wg21.link/p2362r1> that appear in the most recent mailing
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/#mailing2021-07>
> (note that P2362R1 <https://wg21.link/p2362r1> sports a new title).
>
> These papers are now ready for review by EWG and the Github issue tracker
> <https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues> has been updated
> accordingly. Both papers have wording that has been reviewed by a core
> expert and each reflects existing implementation practice.
>
I will note that P2295's treatment of end-of-line indicators for UTF-8
source files has not yet been implemented (to my knowledge) on platforms
where text files traditionally have "out-of-band" line length information.
I am not aware of technical limitations that prevent having a convention
that works in the manner P2295 indicates, so this comment is for
information only.
> P2295 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5> has also been reviewed by SG22 (C/C++
> Liaison) and has not been tagged for review by any other SGs. P2362
> <https://wg21.link/p2362> still awaits SG22 review, so I encourage the
> EWG and SG22 chairs to coordinate to determine if EWG review should await
> SG22's review.
>
> Thank you to both authors for the time and patience they exhibited
> throughout the reviews of these papers; particularly with regard to finding
> wording for P2295 <https://wg21.link/p2295r5>.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
Received on 2021-07-27 17:34:59