C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-05-26 SG16 telecon

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 11:38:39 -0400
On 5/25/21 11:21 AM, Corentin Jabot via SG16 wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 5:19 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:tom_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> On 5/25/21 10:36 AM, Corentin Jabot via SG16 wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:08 PM Tom Honermann via SG16
>> <sg16_at_[hidden] <mailto:sg16_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>
>> Reminder that this meeting is taking place tomorrow. The
>> agenda remains the same.
>>
>> Tom.
>>
>> On 5/16/21 5:23 PM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
>>>
>>> SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, May 26th at 19:30 UTC
>>> (timezone conversion
>>> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210526T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pdt&p3=tz_mdt&p4=tz_cdt&p5=tz_edt&p6=tz_cest>).
>>>
>>> The agenda is:
>>>
>>> * P2295R3: Support for UTF-8 as a portable source file
>>> encoding <https://wg21.link/p2295r3>
>>> o Review updates intended to address prior SG16 feedback.
>>> * P2093R6: Formatted output <https://wg21.link/p2093r6>
>>> o Discuss locale dependent character encoding concerns.
>>>
>>> Since we did not get to discuss P2295R3 at our last telecon,
>>> it will again retain the top spot on the agenda followed by
>>> P2093R6. Thus, the agenda looks much the same as for the
>>> last telecon (I dropped P2348R0 <https://wg21.link/p2348r0>
>>> for now; we won't realistically get to it).
>>>
>>
>> I will try to be there, no promise though.
>
> Thanks for letting me know. If you are unable to attend, and if
> you don't object, we'll still review P2295R3 and carefully record
> any requested changes so that we can keep making progress on this
> paper.
>
>
> Given my disagreement with some recent suggestions, that might be
> counterproductive!

Dropping the mailing list...

Can you elaborate? I'm not sure which recent suggestions you're
referring to. My impression has been that we have good consensus on
moving P2295R3 forward, but perhaps I missed something. How would you
prefer to move forward with this?

Tom.


Received on 2021-05-25 10:38:42