Subject: Re: SG16 meeting summary for March 24th, 2021
From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-28 15:43:51
On 28/03/2021 22.32, Corentin Jabot via SG16 wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:20 PM Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm_at_[hidden] <mailto:alisdairm_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> Iâm still not sure I see it.Â The UB in [lex.phases]p2 is entirely when reverting changes
> in raw string literals, and my understanding of this paper is the only raw string reversion
> that remains is line splicing, and the presence of the newline character means that this
> reversion could never produce a UCN - hence, that particular UB is no longer possible
> as its circumstances can no longer occur.
> \ub \
> Can still appear in a source file.
> We could/should strike this sentence, but it's still a behavior change
> One that affects MSVC.Â https://godbolt.org/z/xK8j3dM1e <https://godbolt.org/z/xK8j3dM1e>
> I would be happyÂ if Jens did that in his paper but I think doing it separately makes sense
With this paper, I'm trying to minimize behavior changes in general,
and in particular I'd like to leave new-line handling alone.
SG16 list run by email@example.com