Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:55:26 -0400
Hi Tom,
Regarding the statement:
Hubert noted that there will be a competing paper partially motivated by a
desire for the standard to remain abstract and not tied too heavily to
Unicode.
I would like to clarify that I was, in part, elaborating on something that
(I believe) either you or Jens said earlier on the call:
Hubert noted that *the competing paper mentioned earlier[*] is* partially
motivated by a desire for the standard to remain abstract and not tied too
heavily to Unicode.
[*] This is a paper that would change C++ to use the same UCN/extended
character model as C.
Thanks,
Hubert Tong
//
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 10:45 PM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The summary for the SG16 meeting held September 23rd, 2020 is now
> available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
>
> - https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#september-23rd-2020
>
> No decisions were made at this meeting.
>
> The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 14th, from
> 19:30-21:00 UTC (timezone conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20201014T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pt&p3=tz_mt&p4=tz_ct&p5=tz_et&p6=tz_cest>).
> The draft agenda is:
>
> - Boost.Text <https://github.com/tzlaine/text>
> - Review changes made following the initial Boost review.
> - P2194R0: The character set of C++ source code is Unicode
> <https://wg21.link/p2194r0>
> - Continue discussion.
>
> For the Boost.Text discussion, please read the following email threads:
>
> - https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2020/06/249242.php
> - https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2020/08/249594.php
>
> For the review of P2194R0, please (re-)read section 5.2.1 (Character Sets)
> of the C99 rationale document
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/C99RationaleV5.10.pdf>,
> especially the "UCN models" section.
>
> No decisions will be made at this meeting, but direction polls are
> expected.
>
> For any new attendees: The meetings are video conferences conducted via
> Zoom. If you are planning to attend, please test your system by visiting
> https://zoom.us/test before the scheduled meeting time.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
Regarding the statement:
Hubert noted that there will be a competing paper partially motivated by a
desire for the standard to remain abstract and not tied too heavily to
Unicode.
I would like to clarify that I was, in part, elaborating on something that
(I believe) either you or Jens said earlier on the call:
Hubert noted that *the competing paper mentioned earlier[*] is* partially
motivated by a desire for the standard to remain abstract and not tied too
heavily to Unicode.
[*] This is a paper that would change C++ to use the same UCN/extended
character model as C.
Thanks,
Hubert Tong
//
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 10:45 PM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The summary for the SG16 meeting held September 23rd, 2020 is now
> available. For those that attended, please review and suggest corrections:
>
> - https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#september-23rd-2020
>
> No decisions were made at this meeting.
>
> The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 14th, from
> 19:30-21:00 UTC (timezone conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20201014T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pt&p3=tz_mt&p4=tz_ct&p5=tz_et&p6=tz_cest>).
> The draft agenda is:
>
> - Boost.Text <https://github.com/tzlaine/text>
> - Review changes made following the initial Boost review.
> - P2194R0: The character set of C++ source code is Unicode
> <https://wg21.link/p2194r0>
> - Continue discussion.
>
> For the Boost.Text discussion, please read the following email threads:
>
> - https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2020/06/249242.php
> - https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2020/08/249594.php
>
> For the review of P2194R0, please (re-)read section 5.2.1 (Character Sets)
> of the C99 rationale document
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/C99RationaleV5.10.pdf>,
> especially the "UCN models" section.
>
> No decisions will be made at this meeting, but direction polls are
> expected.
>
> For any new attendees: The meetings are video conferences conducted via
> Zoom. If you are planning to attend, please test your system by visiting
> https://zoom.us/test before the scheduled meeting time.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>
Received on 2020-09-28 17:55:46