C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] Request to review SG16 material in P2139

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:54:15 -0400
On 7/15/20 11:40 AM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 wrote:
> On Monday I presented P2139 reviewing the deprecated feature in
> Annex D to the LEWG(I) telecon. It was noted that the clauses
> D.20 -> D.23 all seem SG16 related. The consensus on each was
> to remove them from C++23 and rely on the zombie names clause
> so that library vendors will continue to make these features available
> as long as they serve their own customer base, but there was also a
> request that SG16 specifically sign off that we have no objections to
> their removal.

Sounds good, I'll put this on the agenda for next week's meeting (July
22nd; I still need to send out invites). I expect discussion to be
brief. You'll be able to attend?


> There will be an updated paper in the July mailing, but for these
> sections, all it says is that LEWGI is in favor of removal pending
> SG16 confirmation.
> AlisdairM

Received on 2020-07-15 10:57:33