Subject: Re: Request to review SG16 material in P2139
From: Alisdair Meredith (alisdairm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-07-15 11:06:17
Yes, I should be able to make that.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 15, 2020, at 16:54, Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ï»¿On 7/15/20 11:40 AM, Alisdair Meredith via SG16 wrote:
>> On Monday I presented P2139 reviewing the deprecated feature in
>> Annex D to the LEWG(I) telecon. It was noted that the clauses
>> D.20 -> D.23 all seem SG16 related. The consensus on each was
>> to remove them from C++23 and rely on the zombie names clause
>> so that library vendors will continue to make these features available
>> as long as they serve their own customer base, but there was also a
>> request that SG16 specifically sign off that we have no objections to
>> their removal.
> Sounds good, I'll put this on the agenda for next week's meeting (July 22nd; I still need to send out invites). I expect discussion to be brief. You'll be able to attend?
>> There will be an updated paper in the July mailing, but for these
>> sections, all it says is that LEWGI is in favor of removal pending
>> SG16 confirmation.
SG16 list run by email@example.com