Subject: Re: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
From: Steve Downey (sdowney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-12 16:45:41
I thought we polled at one point, but can't find anything to that effect. I
will rewrite it.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020, 17:35 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 1/12/20 1:35 PM, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
> Current draft of "C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31"
> Final format will by html, produced by MPark's wg21 tool. Expanded
> discussion of everything, added explicit character lists, added authors,
> per last telecon.
> This is looking good.
> > SG16 is weakly in favor of making source not in NFC ill-formed, with a
> diagnostic required.
> I don't recall polling this. If we did, feel free to poke fun at my poor
> memory. But if we didn't, then the paper should refrain from making such
> statements. Regardless, statements such as this would ideally be backed up
> by poll citations.
SG16 list run by email@example.com