C++ Logo

SG16

Advanced search

Subject: Re: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
From: Steve Downey (sdowney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-12 16:45:41


I thought we polled at one point, but can't find anything to that effect. I
will rewrite it.

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020, 17:35 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 1/12/20 1:35 PM, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
>
> Current draft of "C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31"
> https://github.com/steve-downey/papers/blob/master/D1949R1.md
> <https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsteve-downey%2Fpapers%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2FD1949R1.md>
> Final format will by html, produced by MPark's wg21 tool. Expanded
> discussion of everything, added explicit character lists, added authors,
> per last telecon.
>
> This is looking good.
>
> > SG16 is weakly in favor of making source not in NFC ill-formed, with a
> diagnostic required.
>
> I don't recall polling this. If we did, feel free to poke fun at my poor
> memory. But if we didn't, then the paper should refrain from making such
> statements. Regardless, statements such as this would ideally be backed up
> by poll citations.
>
> Tom.
>



SG16 list run by sg16-owner@lists.isocpp.org