C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
From: Tom Honermann (tom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-12 16:35:21

On 1/12/20 1:35 PM, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
> Current draft of "C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex
> 31" https://github.com/steve-downey/papers/blob/master/D1949R1.md
> <https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsteve-downey%2Fpapers%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2FD1949R1.md>
> Final format will by html, produced by MPark's wg21 tool. Expanded
> discussion of everything, added explicit character lists, added
> authors, per last telecon.
This is looking good.

> SG16 is weakly in favor of making source not in NFC ill-formed, with
a diagnostic required.

I don't recall polling this.  If we did, feel free to poke fun at my
poor memory.  But if we didn't, then the paper should refrain from
making such statements.  Regardless, statements such as this would
ideally be backed up by poll citations.


SG16 list run by sg16-owner@lists.isocpp.org