C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib] [EXTERNAL] Issue 3341: basic_regex range constructor: Missing requirements for iterator types

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:28:35 -0500
SG16 has a new mailing list. Copying the new one and removing the old
one...

Tom.

On 11/25/19 3:54 PM, Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS) via Lib wrote:
>
> +Unicode.
>
> P3.
>
> It should be noted that http://eel.is/c++draft/re.regex#1
> <http://eel.is/c++draft/re.regex#1> strongly indicates that all
> elements in use are supposed to be **exactly** CharT, not only
> convertible to CharT, and I would prefer to see any resolution here
> keep such a requirement. (Otherwise it’s too easy to pass wchar_t* to
> a char* regex expecting something reasonable to happen)
>
> Billy3
>
> *From:* Lib <lib-bounces_at_[hidden]> *On Behalf Of *Marshall
> Clow via Lib
> *Sent:* Monday, November 25, 2019 9:25 AM
> *To:* lib_at_[hidden]
> *Cc:* Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [isocpp-lib] Issue 3341: basic_regex range
> constructor: Missing requirements for iterator types
>
> It's Monday, so it must be bug prioritization time!
> Thanks to everyone who has participated.
>
> https://wg21.link/LWG3341
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwg21.link%2FLWG3341&data=02%7C01%7Cbion%40microsoft.com%7C797e29531eed488a8d9f08d771cc8090%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637102995459303425&sdata=Aw97pJ0rEnU79HnQag6kbrRh91mYm3DVBC8s%2BNg47Cw%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Priority levels:
> P0 - Has a proposed resolution and that resolution is clearly correct.
> Requires unanimity among the people doing prioritization. Move the
> issue to "Tentatively Ready" or "Ready" (whichever is appropriate for
> the group doing the review); we don't want to spend any more time
> discussing this issue. [Shortened: Approve, and move on.]
> P1 - Showstopper bug; don't ship a standard w/o resolving this.
> P2 - Important bug.
> P3 - Normal bug.
> P4 - Less important bug.
>
> The most common priority should be P3.
>
> Please add your comments to this thread.
>
> -- Marshall
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lib mailing list
> Lib_at_[hidden]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2019/11/14509.php



Received on 2019-12-16 10:31:01