Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:16:00 +0000
I'm writing more detailing wording of my byte IO proposal:
https://github.com/Lyberta/cpp-io
I've found that the most logical way to allocate a section for it is to
move legacy text streams from 29 to 29.2 (and eventually to 29.3) and
put byte IO as 29.1.
Since I plan to work on Unicode streams too, my numbering plan is this:
29 Input/output
29.1 Byte streams (my proposal)
29.2 Unicode streams (to be proposed later)
29.3 Legacy text streams (<iostream> et al)
29.4 File system (<filesystem>)
29.5 C library files
Is this a good idea?
https://github.com/Lyberta/cpp-io
I've found that the most logical way to allocate a section for it is to
move legacy text streams from 29 to 29.2 (and eventually to 29.3) and
put byte IO as 29.1.
Since I plan to work on Unicode streams too, my numbering plan is this:
29 Input/output
29.1 Byte streams (my proposal)
29.2 Unicode streams (to be proposed later)
29.3 Legacy text streams (<iostream> et al)
29.4 File system (<filesystem>)
29.5 C library files
Is this a good idea?
Received on 2019-06-17 20:16:29