I am supportive  of White Paper or whatever  expedited publication process we have at our disposal  that is still under the purview of the WG21 forum for the existing modules TR work.

-- Gaby



From: Steve Downey <sdowney@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 1:50:14 AM
To: ISO C++ Tooling Study Group <sg15@lists.isocpp.org>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@microsoft.com>; Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [isocpp-sg15] January Tooling Study Group meeting planning
 
It sounds like we may need to work out "White Paper" process to publish the modules tooling work? I think the concerns about open access that were part of the reasons for the withdrawal also apply to the modules work. 

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025, 21:07 Michael Spencer via SG15 <sg15@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
It still exists and none of its papers were withdrawn, but we were planning on merging it into the Ecosystem IS.

- Michael Spencer


On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 11:53 AM Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@microsoft.com> wrote:

Is the Modules TR impacted?

 

-- Gaby

 

From: SG15 <sg15-bounces@lists.isocpp.org> On Behalf Of Michael Spencer via SG15
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 11:13 AM
To: Tooling Study Group (SG15) <sg15@lists.isocpp.org>
Cc: Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs@gmail.com>
Subject: [isocpp-sg15] January Tooling Study Group meeting planning

 

With the withdrawal of the EcosystemIS and associated papers, we need to meet to discuss how we should handle other work that was targeting it, and how we plan to deliver tooling related content going forward.

 

Please let me know when you're available here: https://whenisgood.net/2fi7qbg

 

Thanks,

- Michael Spencer

_______________________________________________
SG15 mailing list
SG15@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15