colony is currently unscheduled in the LEWG mailing list. See I asked that Corentin or Inbal reach out to make sure that when a review does occur it uses a revision that has the changes that you have been working on. 

On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 3:15 PM Matt Bentley via SG14 <> wrote:
Thanks Patrice. New times indeed :)

On 9/11/2020 9:48 am, Patrice Roy wrote:
> We have a plenary tomorrow (for me), November 9. It will  be the first
> virtual plenary I attend, and if I understand correctly it will also be
> the first virtual plenary session ever. We're all discovering the ways
> in which to do things today.
> Expect "Colony v. now" to pass through LEWG at least once, followed by
> written discussions, and if all goes well, at some point reach LWG and
> land in a plenary after that. The fact that Jens has helped will be an
> asset here, being the master wordsmith that he is.
> Cheers!
> Le dim. 8 nov. 2020 à 15:41, Matthew Bentley via SG14
> < <>> a écrit :
>     Hi all,
>     have the current version of the proposal in for the next mailing
>     (and uploaded to the SG14 github),
>     version v6.01 of the reference implementation has been released
>     ( <>) which matches
>     the existing proposal fully now.
>     The fully-functional reserve() has been well-received, with some
>     people reporting they held off using it because of the lack of that
>     feature. So I think that was a good call overall, even if there are
>     some GCC9/10 compiler issues relating to performance.
>     Jens has gone through and given me another critique of tech spec of
>     the prev version, which has been integrated. There's a few more
>     questions which I've put in the current versions 'questions for the
>     committee' section, so if anyone has the time to take a look at the
>     github ver they're welcome to give feedback here.
>     Otherwise was just looking for some general clarification around the
>     standardisation process in the age of Covid-19, Michael noted that
>     face to face WG meetings are banned currently, but is
>     standardisation still happening/progressing in the absence of the
>     F2F meetings? And what form does that take? Kinda out of the loop here-
>     Thanks in advance,
>     Matt
>     _______________________________________________
>     SG14 mailing list
> <>
>     <>
SG14 mailing list