On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 15:12, Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>> >> What is a user of P1144 expected to do about
>> >> "pmr and allocator aware types will behave in
>> >> surprising ways when used in containers and
>> >> algorithms" ?
>> >
>> > The proof is in the pudding! Try to find me a "surprising" behavior of allocator-aware types. The complete implementation of P1144, one compiler and two standard libraries, is available for perusal.
>> > - https://godbolt.org/z/eM8saKe6b
>>
>> I take that as a suggestion to stop spending time on P1144 and to
>> focus all work on P2786 instead.
>> I do not have time for reverse-engineering riddles.
>
>
> And yet you have time to troll the SG14 mailing list.

You aren't qualified to call other people's questions trolling.

> Look, you made the claim. Please provide your evidence.

What claim? I was quoting YOUR PAPER. A statement made in P2814R1.

> So don't just toss off a claim like "pmr and allocator aware types will behave in surprising ways when used in containers and algorithms" and bail on the thread. Show me what you're talking about.

That's a claim made by you and your coauthors in P2814R1, in
7 Summary of key differences. I have no idea how you manage to turn
that into my "claim", when I'm asking
you to clarify what you and others have written in a paper.