On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 19:34, Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:35 PM Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 18:29, Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > And there are also two verbose summaries...
>> >
>> > (1) P2814R1 "Comparing P1144 with P2786" (15 pages)
>>
>> Smashing, that one has a summary at the end.
>>
>> What is a user of P1144 expected to do about
>>
>> "pmr and allocator aware types will behave in
>> surprising ways when used in containers and
>> algorithms" ?
>
>
> The proof is in the pudding! Try to find me a "surprising" behavior of allocator-aware types. The complete implementation of P1144, one compiler and two standard libraries, is available for perusal.
> - https://godbolt.org/z/eM8saKe6b

I take that as a suggestion to stop spending time on P1144 and to
focus all work on P2786 instead.
I do not have time for reverse-engineering riddles.