Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:00:35 +0100
On 14/02/2024 04.31, Patrice Roy wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Thanks for the interesting and useful feedback on these two papers. The authors
> will take everything under consideration and (in both cases, for different reasons
> and through different approaches) will use it to carve a new and improved version,
> though not for the Feb. mailing since it's very close.
>
> If SG14 wants to discuss them further tomorrow and provide additional feedback,
> that's fine and it will be taken into account, but there's already good material
> to work from so if the agenda's full there's no need to rush this.
Next time, it would be good to initiate two different reflector threads,
each with an informative subject, instead of lumping both papers into
a nondescript "two papers to look at" subject.
Thanks,
Jens
> Hi everyone!
>
> Thanks for the interesting and useful feedback on these two papers. The authors
> will take everything under consideration and (in both cases, for different reasons
> and through different approaches) will use it to carve a new and improved version,
> though not for the Feb. mailing since it's very close.
>
> If SG14 wants to discuss them further tomorrow and provide additional feedback,
> that's fine and it will be taken into account, but there's already good material
> to work from so if the agenda's full there's no need to rush this.
Next time, it would be good to initiate two different reflector threads,
each with an informative subject, instead of lumping both papers into
a nondescript "two papers to look at" subject.
Thanks,
Jens
Received on 2024-02-14 08:00:43