I'm sure it will, but I need to make sure I carried the original
requester's words right first.

I appreciate your feedback and guidance, obviously. I expect that request
not to go the way of an actual paper in the end, but it's not entirely for
me to say.

Thanks!

Le mar. 19 sept. 2023 à 15:06, Jens Maurer <jens.maurer_at_[hidden]> a écrit :

>
>
> On 19/09/2023 15.35, Patrice Roy via SG14 wrote:
> > Thanks. The actual path to take will depend on the actual paper to come.
> Right now, what we have is a request for a «feature» in the list compiled
> by P2966, and until there is an actual paper written on that one I don't
> know what form the actual, formal request will take.
>
> For the avoidance of doubt: A "formal request" and a paper to WG21
> are scope-wise incorrect approaches to address this particular item.
> You have been advised to double-check whether there is a remaining
> issue, and if so, file a vendor bug report. The item should be
> dropped from any paper addressed to WG21 (or marked as "NAD"
> or "out-of-scope", if posterity is important).
>
> Thanks,
> Jens
>
>
>