C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG14] No call tomorrow Aug 11

From: Tjernstrom, Staffan <Staffan.Tjernstrom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:49:55 +0000
Arthur wrote:
(8) Re inplace_function "implementation experience": You might link to the SG14 repo's implementation. ;) And I'd be interested to learn whether any of your contributors are actually using it in practice, and if not, why not, and how can we get them to switch to it. I mean, if people are avoiding an existing free library and rolling their own anyway, then how can we be sure that they wouldn't have the same reaction to a std::inplace_function after standardization? In which case, standardizing inplace_function would be wasted effort.
As a data point (albeit from a different sphere), we use stdext::inplace_function in a number of our code-bases. Where it's not performance critical, std::function still gets used, which is mostly an internal education issue.


IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.

Received on 2021-09-08 06:50:00