C++ Logo

SG14

Advanced search

Subject: Re: Challenging the deprecation of volatile compound statements
From: Ben Craig (ben.craig_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-03-12 17:01:27


To get the paper in the mailing, send it to Hal Finkel. hal.finkel.wg21_at_[hidden]

This is covered here: https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-7-mailing-procedures-and-how-to-write-papers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SG14 <sg14-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Paul M. Bendixen
> via SG14
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 4:11 PM
> To: Low Latency:Game Dev/Financial/Trading/Simulation/Embedded Devices
> <sg14_at_[hidden]>; Wouter van Ooijen <wouter.vanooijen_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: Paul M. Bendixen <paulbendixen_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SG14] Challenging the deprecation of volatile
> compound statements
>
> A last minute update for the paper.
> I've added a new section (2.3) that describes how removing the possibility to
> have compound expressions might generate bugs.
>
> If it is too abrasive, please let me know, however I feel this is also an
> important point.
>
> Michael I don't really know how to get this paper into the mailing for the next
> meeting, could you help with this? (Also should I update the R number?)
>
> I was made aware that the deprecation paper will also be discussed at the
> upcoming liaison meeting with the C committee. So maybe this could be
> valuable input.
>
> /Paul
> --
> • − − •/• −/• • −/• − • •/− • • •/•/− •/− • •/• •/− • • −/•/− •/• − − •− •/−
> − •/− −/• −/• •/• − • •/• − • − • −/− • − •/− − −/− −//


SG14 list run by sg14-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Older Archives on Google Groups